Group: Members
Posts: 804
Member No.: 6517
Joined: March 27, 2014
It could end up costing some lives. Some won't think twice but others will try and avoid the rescue at a higher price.
Owner sound mayor referenced a rescue bill to someone who fell off a cliff the bill 15 thousand. Even 5 k some will choose it's not worth it. . Then again how many are willing to loose it all and not pay for it? Or even afford it they will pick and choose to either pay it or ignore it.
We will never be able to fix stupid even with a price.
Group: Members
Posts: 100
Member No.: 14639
Joined: October 21, 2017
all thanks goes out to the first responders in this situation as they are the true heros. that aside i feel this situation could have happened to any one of us, if i remember correctly a similar situation happened on simcoe a few years back where wind broke off a piece of ice leaving fishermen stranded. Thats exactly why i choose my ice fishing spots so carefully maximizing my chances for safety. I like simple spots easy access shying away from larger waterbodies. I think this was a chance happening could it have been avoided possibly should they get a bill? no they shouldnt. im sure the loss of all there gear will be a hard enough pill to swallow.
Group: Members
Posts: 58
Member No.: 18344
Joined: May 29, 2020
A smarter middle ground.
The most workable approaches tend to be:
Clear rules ahead of time (e.g., “after X date or warning, you may be billed”) Fines for violating explicit closures, not subjective judgment Insurance based models (used in parts of Europe for mountain rescue)
So if we go with the insurance based model, we tag that onto the license for fishing in Ontario. Wanna Icefish? then you need to pay extra which covers insurance.
I get both sides but there needs to be a middle ground.
Group: Members
Posts: 380
Member No.: 19144
Joined: March 19, 2021
QUOTE (Coda @ Mar 27, 2026 - 10:44 am)
A smarter middle ground.
The most workable approaches tend to be:
Clear rules ahead of time (e.g., “after X date or warning, you may be billed”) Fines for violating explicit closures, not subjective judgment Insurance based models (used in parts of Europe for mountain rescue)
So if we go with the insurance based model, we tag that onto the license for fishing in Ontario. Wanna Icefish? then you need to pay extra which covers insurance.
I get both sides but there needs to be a middle ground.
I don’t think so. We face enough government overreach as it is!
Group: Members
Posts: 4146
Member No.: 18589
Joined: September 15, 2020
Mother Nature gives us signs of danger that should trigger our common sense. These indications help us avoid a dangerous situation. Everyone should know not to go fishing when there is thunder. Where there is thunder there is always, always, always lightning. Even if the thunder sounds far away, a lightning strike may hit near where you are fishing. Weather changes in early or late winter change ice conditions quickly. Rain, air temperature, wind etc. Short ice on shore, open cracks off shore, changes in ice colour, ice movement with waves or current. More signs of danger we all know, or should know before we head out onto the ice. There is also the current and future hourly forecasts, that are easily accessible to everyone. Conditions before leaving and when arriving at the destination may change. Conditions can change from one hour to the next. There were signs of bad ice that day and wind in the forecast, as well as warnings from the OPP up to a week previous to this event. That is another great benefit of this Fishing Forum... People helping people. Of course no ice is safe ice...But it's nice to get some quality information from one member to another when planning a fishing trip. Conditions can change, the actions and responsibility remain totally on the angler to assess the ice on arrival and have all the gear necessary to stay alive. Gratefull that so many people read this post and many commenting as well. If we assist one person with good advice, it makes the post relevant. If we actually learn from our mistakes, it makes us better people. As for lightning, it's hard to learn from a mistake if you get hit by a bolt of lightning. Stay safe.
Group: Members
Posts: 55
Member No.: 20264
Joined: February 15, 2023
QUOTE (Drew @ Mar 10, 2026 - 09:31 pm)
I don’t know all the details, and won’t claim to. From what I read there was near a couple feet of ice. And in my opinion it IS the first responders job to attend to an emergency, which this clearly was. Whether on purpose, by accident, act of God, or the result of someone’s stupid decision, when there is a problem, we have first responders to react. They signed up for this and have been highly trained for just such an occurrence.
By your logic, if someone does anything deemed stupid, they should not be helped? So if you’re speeding, and crash - no help. If you drop a cigarette and set your house on fire - no help. If you crash a snowmobile into a tree because you’re going a bit too fast, you’re on your own. What about the guy who called rescue on himself stuck in slush on Lake Joe last week. Shouldn’t have been out when there’s slush, so, no help for you.
Doesn’t make sense to me. I would argue that a high percentage of all emergencies are due to someone’s lack of better judgement. It’s literally why we have first responders. They got to burn up some old fuel in the helicopters and put their training to use. Got a good adrenaline rush, and feel good about their teamwork in saving some lives.
like I said, I don’t know all the details of the situation, but everyone made it, and the emergency crews did what they do. Seems like a happy ending, not a chance to place blame.
IMO, they should be rescued/helped but they should have to pay a price big enough that they would not act stupid again. I guess that's pretty fair.
Group: Members
Posts: 714
Member No.: 7784
Joined: December 31, 2014
I hope someone seconds the idea of ending this post because in my opinion there's way too much finger pointing and ridicule. I know that people have been thankful that no one lost their lives and grateful to the First Responders but it doesn't seem like that is the primary idea.. how about nobody has to pay anything Financial for being rescued in our great country.. I would think the scare of a lifetime is a big enough price to pay and probably enough of a lesson learned. Calling people stupid when they're down especially people in your own community doesn't leave a good taste in my mouth. We all take risks. Some people think the things I do are super unsafe and there's things other people do that I think are super unsafe. We all have our own guideline of what's safe and what isn't safe. I don't think because anyone on this board thinks something is so unsafe that they draw the line of where the standard is. I'm sure we all get in cars every day which is a super high risk and I know that's comparing apples to oranges but I am trying to just put things in perspective on the copious amounts of ridicule. Until next I season hopefully there's no fatalities as well as no more finger pointing. Let's just be grateful and move on guys
Group: Members
Posts: 4146
Member No.: 18589
Joined: September 15, 2020
QUOTE (Andy14 @ Apr 07, 2026 - 07:02 pm)
I hope someone seconds the idea of ending this post because in my opinion there's way too much finger pointing and ridicule. I know that people have been thankful that no one lost their lives and grateful to the First Responders but it doesn't seem like that is the primary idea.. how about nobody has to pay anything Financial for being rescued in our great country.. I would think the scare of a lifetime is a big enough price to pay and probably enough of a lesson learned. Calling people stupid when they're down especially people in your own community doesn't leave a good taste in my mouth. We all take risks. Some people think the things I do are super unsafe and there's things other people do that I think are super unsafe. We all have our own guideline of what's safe and what isn't safe. I don't think because anyone on this board thinks something is so unsafe that they draw the line of where the standard is. I'm sure we all get in cars every day which is a super high risk and I know that's comparing apples to oranges but I am trying to just put things in perspective on the copious amounts of ridicule. Until next I season hopefully there's no fatalities as well as no more finger pointing. Let's just be grateful and move on guys
You chose the perfect word, when you said perspective. My original post as well as my follow ups were written for just that exact reason. The perspective of the First Responders and the families of the 32 anglers rescued that day. Also for anyone reading this posted topic. Perspective in understanding the importance of the post. Everyone is going to form their own opinion from their perspective of this topic. Many of us have decades of experience with soft water and hard water fishing. So our perspective in general is that fishing can/may be dangerous in certain situations. Everyone has an opinion of this ice rescue and should be allowed to share it. If just one comment assists someone else in a life changing decision, it was worth it to share. These 32 anglers that put themselves in danger, should be tough enough to take a few harsh words. I know the First Responders had plenty of harsh words for them after the 32 anglers were rescued. Hopefully they understood the harsh words and won't be irresponsible again with their lives.... Or the lives of the First Responders.
Group: Members
Posts: 2754
Member No.: 10908
Joined: January 25, 2016
This post should be closed. No one is going to agree completely one way or the other. Post like this can get out of hand. We have an amazing group here and I hope we all work together to forward our sport and work to keep accesses open. Half of us will say this all was an error and half will say it’s stupidity. The truth lies somewhere in between usually.
Group: Members
Posts: 1912
Member No.: 15807
Joined: March 11, 2018
I put all the blame on the fish tempting us all Yes, it's probably a good time to end the post and have a good thought and then think again when we are in situations when we are tempted to head out after some fish when the risks are higher. Remember you will catch more fish if you can fish in the future.
Group: Members
Posts: 4146
Member No.: 18589
Joined: September 15, 2020
Sure the Moderator can close it if he likes. With over 3000 views, I would say it was read enough to shed some light on not what to do on questionable ice and warm, windy, weather conditions. Thanks for all the comments. Good luck everybody on a safe soft water season.
Fishing Lake Simcoe
Fishing forum for Lake Simcoe & Area. Fishing Reports, Current Ice Conditions, Fishing Tips, Discussions & More. Featuring Ice Hut Rentals, Accommodations, Bait & Tackle shops, Marinas and Fishing Guides. The best fishing in Simcoe County!
Lake Simcoe Outdoors - Fishing Forum : Fishing Tips, Current Conditions, Fishing Reports & more! Fishing Lake Simcoe & Area